What could be more incriminating? What could be more revealing? If the Met didn't lie in the aftermath of the murder of Jean Charles de Menezes, then why is it so concerned to hide away the one officer who has broken ranks and told a conflicting account of the events of that time?
Guardian Unlimited | Special reports | Officer who challenged Met chief may lose job
Tuesday, April 18, 2006
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
The trouble with Paddick is that he comes across as a professional trouble maker, so it is more likely that he has been "off message" on just one occasion too many. However, that is not how it looks, so his removal is going to look like another layer of cover up.
Post a Comment